Lockhart v. United States, 577 U.S. ___ (2016), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning the interpretation of a federal statute. 18 U.S.C. § 2252(b)(2) states that a defendant convicted of possessing child pornography is subject to a mandatory 10 year minimum prison sentence if they have "a … Zobacz więcej • List of United States Supreme Court cases • Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume • List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court Zobacz więcej • Text of Lockhart v. United States, 577 U.S. ___ (2016) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Zobacz więcej WitrynaGet free access to the complete judgment in LOCKHART v. UNITED STATES on CaseMine.
Lockhart v. United States: A Lesson in Textual Interpretation
WitrynaThe case is Lockhart v. United States, 136 s. Ct. 958 (2016). It’s fascinating for the debate over conflicting canons of construction, the import of related statutes, and the value of legislative history. Think of it as a perfect vehicle for examining what seems to me the Court’s overreliance on textual methods of interpretation, and ... Witryna15 maj 2014 · As discussed above, Lockhart pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252 (a) (4) and was sentenced pursuant to § … encryptbytearray c++
Lockhart v. United States, No. 15-3156 (8th Cir. 2016) :: Justia
Witryna3 lis 2015 · Lockhart was subsequently charged with possession of child pornography, and he pled guilty. Lockhart had previously been convicted in state court of first … Witryna20 maj 2015 · The denial of Lockhart's motion to correct erroneous sentence was affirmed. Lockhart now belatedly appeals his 1998 re-sentencing. This court also … WitrynaIn Donato v. United States, 302 F.2d 468 (9th Cir. 1962), we remanded for further consideration by the district court because of a showing by the defendant that he may have been physically prevented from taking an appeal within the allotted time. Summary of this case from United States v. Kincaid. encryptbin